Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SUCCESSIONS OF Milton COTAYA & Edna Cotaya
Appellant, the succession representative, Vicki Tosh, appeals the trial court's April 11, 2023 judgment 1 dismissing her Petition to Open Succession, Probate Will and Confirm Administrator in docket number 837-862. For the following reason, appellant's appeal is dismissed.
DISCUSSION
Jurisdiction
In this contentious litigation, Ms. Tosh filed the instant appeal concerning the trial court's April 11, 2023 judgment which dismissed her Petition to Open Succession, Probate Will and Confirm Administrator (“petition”) in Successions of Milton Cotaya and Edna Cotaya, docket number 837-862 in the 24th Judicial District Court. Ms. Tosh asserts that the trial court erred in considering Lee Cotaya's “Motion and Incorporated Memorandum to Remove Vicki Tosh as Executrix and Dismiss These Proceedings,” (“motion to dismiss”), granting the motion to dismiss, and dismissing her petition in docket number 837-862.
Upon review, we find this appeal concerns the same judgment and issues previously appealed in this court in docket number 24-CA-39. 2 For the reasons stated in that appeal, this court affirmed the trial court's judgment dismissing Ms. Tosh's petition. Successions of Milton Cotaya and Edna Cotaya, 24-39 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/05/24), — So.3d —, 2024 WL 4985656. Because this court has already reviewed and affirmed the judgment dismissing Ms. Tosh's petition in docket number 837-862, there is nothing further for this court to review under our appellate jurisdiction in the instant appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
DECREE
For the reason stated herein, this appeal is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED
FOOTNOTES
1. Upon review of the trial record, in docket number 24-CA-39, this court found that docket number 837-862 did not contain a separate judgment for this court to review. The trial court was informed that the rulings for docket number 837-862 were improperly included in the April 11, 2023 judgment for docket number 838-243 consolidated with docket number 838-251. Once again, this court pointed out to the parties that docket number 837-862 is not consolidated with 838-243, which is consolidated with 838-251. The trial court subsequently rendered a separate judgment for this case, docket number 837-862, on August 2, 2024.
2. Appellant's brief states that she is appealing the April 11, 2023 judgment concerning the trial court's rulings on April 3, 2023, as indicated by appellant's motion for appeal filed June 5, 2023.
WINDHORST, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 24-CA-226
Decided: December 20, 2024
Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)