Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Arthur David LeMASTER, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER
Movant is presently charged in a disciplinary proceeding before the Kentucky Bar Association with violation of the Code of Professional Conduct. Movant was convicted in the United States District Court of a felony offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, § 1001. He was temporarily suspended from practice on March 15, 1994, following his conviction.
After an unsuccessful appeal of his conviction, movant now seeks to terminate disciplinary proceedings against him. He seeks to surrender his license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky and to resign from the Kentucky Bar Association, pursuant to SCR 3.480(3), for a period of four years, to commence on the date of entry of the order temporarily suspending him.
In its response to this Court, the Kentucky Bar Association raised no objection to the Motion to resign, however the Board recommended that movant not be given credit for the period of temporary suspension.
The Inquiry Tribunal has charged Movant with one count of professional misconduct in violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(b). SCR 3.130-8.3(b) provides that it is professional misconduct for an attorney to commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.
The charge is based upon Movant's conviction after trial by jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky of making false and fraudulent statements to Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a felony offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, § 1001, case number 93-6, styled United States of America v. David LeMaster. Movant was sentenced to twelve months to serve and two years supervised probation, and assessed the costs. The appeal concluded on May 25, 1995, and movant has since been serving his sentence.
Movant acknowledges that he has engaged in professional misconduct, and desires to end the pending disciplinary proceeding. Thus, his motion for leave to surrender his license and to resign from the Kentucky Bar Association, for a period of four years is hereby GRANTED.
The request by movant for a retroactive application of the period of suspension is DENIED. Movant does not allege, and there is no evidence, that the KBA has failed to diligently prosecute this matter. That being the case, the Court will not grant credit for the period that has elapsed since the date of the entry of the order temporarily suspending him. Furthermore, movant cites no authority persuasive or otherwise, to convince this Court to take such a step.
It is therefore ordered that the motion of Arthur David LeMaster to resign from the Kentucky Bar Association and to surrender his license to practice law in the Commonwealth for a period of four years is granted.
It is further ordered that:
1) Movant shall not be permitted to engage in the practice of law, as defined by SCR 3.020, in the Commonwealth of Kentucky until such time as the Supreme Court of Kentucky enters an order reinstating his membership in the Kentucky Bar Association.
2) Movant shall not file an application for reinstatement for a period of four years from the date of this order.
3) Any application for reinstatement filed by movant shall be governed by SCR 3.510, reinstatement in case of disciplinary suspension, or any subsequent amendment to SCR 3.510.
4) The costs of all disciplinary proceedings pending against movant shall be paid by movant in accordance with SCR 3.450(1) and SCR 3.480(3)
5) Movant represents that he has complied, pursuant to a previous order of Temporary Suspension, with the provisions of SCR 3.390 requiring notice to all courts in which he has matters pending and to all clients, whom he was actively representing, of his inability to continue to represent them.
All concur.
ENTERED October 30, 1997.
/s/ Robert F. Stephens
/s/ Chief Justice.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 97-SC-765-KB.
Decided: October 30, 1997
Court: Supreme Court of Kentucky.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)