Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marc H. LEVY, Movant, v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER
Movant, Marc H. Levy, of Louisville, Kentucky, requests that this Court enter an order suspending his license to practice law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky for sixty (60) days. Respondent, Kentucky Bar Association (“KBA”), has no objection to Movant's request.
The case arises out of Movant's representation of Omni Insurance (“Omni”) in a subrogation action against Lorna Wilson in Jefferson County. According to the three-count charge issued against Movant by the Inquiry Tribunal, Movant filed suit on behalf of Omni on August 27, 1993, but failed to have the defendant timely served. After Movant admittedly failed to respond to a show cause order or appear at a subsequent show cause hearing on November 1, 1994, the Jefferson Circuit Court dismissed the case. Movant eventually managed to reopen the case, serve the defendant, and obtain a judgment on Omni's behalf. However, he concedes that, from August of 1993 to November of 1995, he failed to respond to numerous telephonic and written requests for information about the case made by three different Omni claims agents.
Accordingly, Movant admits being guilty of Count I of the Inquiry Tribunal's charge. Count I alleged a violation of SCR 3.130-1.3, which requires an attorney to act with “reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.” Count II, of which Movant also acknowledges his guilt, accused Movant of violating SCR 3.130-1.4(a), which provides that a lawyer should keep his client “reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.” Movant denies Count III, which charged him with knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter, in violation of SCR 3.130-8.1(a).
In its response, the KBA indicates that it agrees with the substance of Movant's summary of events, has no objection to the dismissal of Count III, and asks this Court to suspend Movant for sixty days. The KBA also notes that Movant has reimbursed the KBA for its costs expended in the matter. Therefore, it is the judgment and order of this Court that the Movant be and he is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of sixty (60) days.
ENTERED: September 4, 1997.
/s/ Robert F. Stephens
/s/ Chief Justice
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 97-SC-449-KB.
Decided: September 04, 1997
Court: Supreme Court of Kentucky.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)