Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jeffrey WEISHEIT, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
Published Order
On August 28, 2026, the Court ordered Jeffrey Weisheit's death sentence to be executed on Thursday, November 5, before sunrise. Weisheit petitioned for clemency with the Indiana Parole Board on September 15. The Board set an October 15 deadline for the parties to submit written materials, with interviews to take place October 16 and 19.
On October 12, Weisheit filed two emergency motions in this Court seeking the following relief: (1) a transportation order to a medical imaging facility; and (2) an order postponing the execution and clemency proceedings by 14 days to allow Weisheit time to undergo brain scans for use in his clemency proceedings. The State opposes both motions.
Weisheit's motion correctly states that “[c]lemency is the exclusive and plenary power of the Governor,” and he cites no authority that would allow this Court to postpone, reschedule, or otherwise control clemency proceedings. The executive branch maintains custody of Weisheit. If the Board or the Governor finds the medical evidence relevant, the executive branch maintains its own authority to transport him without a court order. Weisheit also indicates that this request is independent of (1) a separate anticipated request for a stay of execution accompanying a challenge to the method of execution; and (2) a stay request associated with a petition for leave to file a successive petition for post-conviction relief. As of the date of this order, neither request has been filed, nor has Weisheit initiated any proceeding that would confer upon this Court the authority to order Weisheit's transportation.
Being duly advised, the Court DENIES Weisheit's “Emergency Motion to Reschedule Execution and Clemency Proceedings” and “Emergency Motion for Transport Order to Medical Imaging Facility.”
All Justices concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Supreme Court Case No. 10S00-1507-PD-413
Decided: October 22, 2026
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Answer a few questions and get helpful next steps for your legal issue.