Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Marco A. Genesis MORENO, Respondent
Published Order Indefinitely Suspending Respondent from the Practice of Law in Indiana for Repeated Noncooperation
On June 28, 2022, pursuant to a show cause petition filed by the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, this Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Respondent should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state for failure to cooperate with the Commission's investigation of grievance No. 22-0994 filed against Respondent, and further why Respondent should not be indefinitely suspended for repeated failures to cooperate. The order required that Respondent show cause in writing within ten days of service of the order. Respondent has not submitted a response to the Court's order to show cause. On July 12, 2022, the Commission filed a “Request for Ruling and to Tax Costs” asserting that Respondent still has not cooperated, to which Respondent has not responded.
Being duly advised, the Court ORDERS, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10.1)(c)(5), that Respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for repeatedly failing to cooperate with the disciplinary process, effective immediately.
Respondent is already under suspension as ordered in Case No. 22S-DI-152 and also is under suspension for continuing legal education noncompliance. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the continuing duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). To be readmitted to the practice of law in this State, Respondent must cure the causes of all suspensions in effect and successfully petition this Court for reinstatement pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(18)(b).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10.1)(d), that Respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $522.39 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.
All Justices concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Supreme Court Case No. 22S-DI-218
Decided: September 01, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)