Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Order
This matter comes before the Court on the petition for rehearing that International Business Machine Corporation (“IBM”) filed on July 25, 2019, and the parties' briefing on the petition.
Being duly advised, the Court grants rehearing in part and modifies its original opinion, issued June 26, 2019, as follows:
We hold that the post-judgment interest due to IBM runs stems from the judgment on remand. Under Indiana Code section 34-13-1-6, the judgment “draw[s] interest at an annual rate of six percent (6%) from the date of the adjournment of the next ensuing session of the general assembly․” Following the judgment in this case on August 4, 2017, the next ensuing session of the General Assembly adjourned on March 14, 2018. Therefore, the post-judgment interest due to IBM runs from March 14, 2018. We summarily affirm the Court of Appeals on all other issues and affirm the trial court on all issues.
Slip op. 7.
Contemporaneous with the entry of this Order, the Court is filing its Opinion on Rehearing reflecting these changes.
I respectfully dissent from the Court's limited grant of rehearing. For the reasons expressed in my separate opinion, IBM v. State, 124 N.E.3d 1187, 1191-93 (Ind. 2019) (Slaughter, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part), I would modify the Court's opinion further by treating the State's additional costs to implement “Hybrid” not as direct damages subject to a $125-million cap but as consequential damages subject to a $3-million cap.
Rush, CJ., David, J., and Goff, J., concur. Slaughter, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with separate opinion. Massa, J., not participating.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Supreme Court Case No. 19S-PL-19
Decided: October 10, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)