Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mitchell SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. S.P. REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellee.
Published Order Setting Oral Argument and Inviting Amicus Briefing
The Court has determined the above-captioned case merits oral argument. The argument will be conducted in the Courtroom of the Indiana Supreme Court, 317 Statehouse, 200 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Indiana on:
Thursday, October 29, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.
Attorneys of record shall file an acknowledgement of the argument setting no later than fifteen days after service of this order and should arrive thirty minutes before the argument. Important information about oral argument procedures is in Appellate Rules 52 and 53, and online at https://www.in.gov/courts/supreme/arguments/instructions/. Contact Supreme Court Services at 317-233-8700 with questions not answered on the website or by the rules.
The Court invites briefing from any amici with an interest in this case on the following question: Whether the Comparative Fault Act permits allocating fault to a plaintiff for a defendant's intentional tort. Any entity wishing to prepare and file an amicus brief must file a motion for leave to appear as amicus and tender its proposed brief no later than Monday, August 31, 2026. See App. R. 41. The Court encourages the submission of joint briefs if similarly aligned entities seek to appear as amici. Any amicus brief must not exceed 4,200 words, exclusive of the items listed in Appellate Rule 44(C), and must be accompanied by the verified statement of word count. See App. R. 44(F). The parties may each file a single response brief, not exceeding 4,200 words, addressing the amicus brief(s); any such response must be filed no later than Monday, September 21, 2026, and must comply with Appellate Rules 44(C) and (F). After briefing has concluded, the Court will issue a separate order allocating oral argument time.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 25A-CT-165
Decided: July 09, 2026
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)