JEFFERSON JEAN BAPTISTE v. STATE OF INDIANA (2017)

Supreme Court of Indiana.

JEFFERSON JEAN-BAPTISTE, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 49S02-1707-CR-00500

Decided: October 03, 2017

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT, Suzy St. John, Ruth Ann Johnson, Marion County Public Defender Agency, Indianapolis, IN ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE, Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana, Stephen R. Creason, Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Attorneys General, Indianapolis, Indiana

After a bench trial in Marion Superior Court, Jefferson Jean-Baptiste was convicted of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement. The Court of Appeals reversed Jean-Baptiste's conviction on grounds of insufficient evidence. The Court of Appeals also sua sponte addressed a constitutional question, and reversed for that reason as well. We granted the State's petition to transfer by order dated July 27, 2017.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that reversal is warranted because the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support Jean-Baptiste's conviction. We therefore summarily affirm all portions of the Court of Appeals opinion except its sua sponte constitutional analysis and holding, which remain vacated. See Appellate Rule 58(A). In keeping with our longstanding principle of constitutional avoidance, we decline to address that issue. See Citimortgage v. Barabas, 975 N.E.2d 805, 818 (Ind. 2012).

Per Curiam.

All Justices concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network