Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robbin STEWART, Respondent
Published Order Approving Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline
Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(12.1)(b), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have submitted for approval a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline” stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline as summarized below.
Stipulated Facts: While representing himself in an ordinance violation matter brought by the Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County (HHC), Respondent sent an aggressive and profane email to the HHC attorney that was reasonably perceived as threatening in nature. As a result, the next hearing scheduled in the case was converted from in-person to remote due to safety concerns.
Although Respondent appears frequently on his own behalf in matters brought by the HHC, he has not otherwise practiced law since approximately 2005. Respondent has apologized to the HHC attorney involved, and the conditional agreement reflects this email was an isolated incident and no concerns about Respondent's professionalism or conduct prior or subsequent to this matter have been reported.
Violation: The parties agree that Respondent violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(d), which prohibits engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Discipline: The parties propose the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand. The Court, having considered the submissions of the parties, now approves the agreed discipline and imposes a public reprimand for Respondent's misconduct.
The costs of this proceeding are assessed against Respondent. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court hereby orders Respondent to pay $250.00 by check made payable and transmitted to the Clerk of the Indiana Supreme Court. Additional expenses taxable under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(21)(a), if any, will be submitted separately.
With the acceptance of this agreement, the hearing officer appointed in this case is discharged with the Court's appreciation.
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana
All Justices concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Supreme Court Case No. 25S-DI-159
Decided: April 24, 2026
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)