Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Henry Bachmann, Appellant-Defendant v. State of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM DECISION
[1] In September 2025, the State charged Henry Bachmann with two counts of Level 2 felony conspiracy to commit murder. At Bachmann's initial hearing, the trial court set bond at $750,000 cash. In February 2026, Bachmann moved to reduce his bond, which the court denied. Bachmann subsequently brought this appeal challenging that denial.
[2] In the meantime, the State amended the charging information to add two counts of Level 1 felony attempted murder.1 In September 2026, after briefing was completed in this appeal, a jury trial was held. The jury found Bachmann not guilty of one count of Level 1 felony attempted murder and one count of Level 2 felony conspiracy to commit murder but could not reach a verdict on the other two counts, so the trial court declared a mistrial on those two counts. At a hearing on September 29, the court reduced Bachmann's bond to $500,000 and ordered him placed on pretrial home detention with electronic monitoring upon payment of bond. See Amended Order on Bond Conditions, Cause No. 22D01-2509-F2-1609 (Sept. 29, 2026). Bachmann's bond was paid the same day. See Cause No. 22D01-2509-F2-1609 (Sept. 29, 2026 CCS entry). Because Bachmann's $750,000 bond was reduced, and his bond has since been paid, this appeal is moot. See Mosley v. State, 908 N.E.2d 599, 603 (Ind. 2009) (“[A] case is deemed moot when no effective relief can be rendered to the parties before the court.”); Samm v. State, 893 N.E.2d 761, 768 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (in appeal from denial of bail reduction, finding “that issue is now moot because Samm's bond was reduced and he posted bond and has been released”). We therefore dismiss the appeal.
[3] Dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. We take judicial notice of the amended charging information and the trial court's September 29, 2026 Amended Order on Bond Conditions. See Ind. Evidence Rule 201(b)(5).
Vaidik, Judge.
Tavitas, C.J., and May, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 26A-CR-778
Decided: October 29, 2026
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)