Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Fredrick AUSTIN, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
[1] Fredrick Austin appeals his convictions on two counts of Level 1 felony child molesting, arguing the evidence is insufficient to support them. We agree. To convict Austin of Level 1 felony child molesting as charged in this case, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in “other sexual conduct” with H.A., a child under fourteen. Ind. Code § 35-42-4-3(a)(1); Appellant's App. Vol. II pp. 35-36. As relevant here, “other sexual conduct” is defined as “an act involving ․ the penetration of the sex organ or anus of a person by an object.” I.C. § 35-31.5-2-221.5(2). The only evidence the State points to in support of the convictions is H.A.’s testimony that Austin used his “whole hand” to rub “up and down” on the “outside” of her “private part” and that it made her feel “tingly.” Tr. Vol. II pp. 181-83, 188-91. While “the slightest penetration of the sex organ, including penetration of the external genitalia, is sufficient” to prove “other sexual conduct,” Boggs v. State, 104 N.E.3d 1287, 1289 (Ind. 2018), the evidence here doesn't establish even “slight” penetration.
[2] The State relies heavily on Hale v. State, 128 N.E.3d 456 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019), trans. denied, but that case is distinguishable. In Hale, we affirmed Level 1 felony child-molesting convictions where the victim said the defendant touched her vagina not just with his hand but with individual fingers, that it was like he was “trying to find something,” that he was “pressing down really hard,” and that it “hurt.” Id. at 461-63. There is no such evidence in this case.
[3] We therefore reverse the Level 1 felony convictions. As requested by Austin, we remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to replace the two Level 1 felony convictions with two convictions for Level 4 felony child molesting (“fondling or touching”) and to re-sentence Austin accordingly.1
[4] Reversed and remanded.
FOOTNOTES
1. At trial, the court granted the State's request to instruct the jury on the included offense of attempted child molesting, which would also be a Level 1 felony. See I.C. § 35-41-5-1(a). On appeal, the State doesn't argue that the Level 1 felony child-molesting convictions should be or could be replaced with Level 1 felony attempted child-molesting convictions. In any event, for the same reason the evidence doesn't establish penetration, it doesn't establish attempted penetration.
Vaidik, Judge.
Riley, J., and Bailey, J., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 22A-CR-1240
Decided: December 28, 2022
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)