Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jermaine T. DEARMAN, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff.
Statement of the Case
[1] Jermaine Dearman appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, as a Level 6 felony, following a bench trial. Dearman presents a single issue for our review, namely, whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction. We reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] On June 10, 2019, the State charged Dearman with possession of a controlled substance, as a Level 6 felony (“Count I”), and possession of marijuana, as a Class A misdemeanor (“Count II”). The information for Count I alleged that Dearman violated Indiana Code Section 35-48-4-7(a) (2019) when he possessed “Tetrahydrocannabinols [‘THC’] (pure or adulterated) listed in Schedule I” while in the possession of a handgun. Appellant's App. Vol. 2 at 13. Dearman pleaded guilty to Count II.
[3] At a bench trial on Count I, the parties stipulated to the facts, including that Dearman possessed vape cartridges containing hash oil. In his opening statement, defense counsel argued that Dearman could not be convicted as charged because Indiana Code Section 35-48-4-7(a) “specifically excludes marijuana,” which is defined in relevant part as hash oil. Tr. at 14. The trial court took the matter under advisement and found Dearman guilty as charged and entered judgment of conviction for Count I. This appeal ensued.
Discussion and Decision
[4] Dearman contends, and the State agrees, that his conviction on Count I must be vacated. At trial on Count I, the parties stipulated that Dearman possessed “vape cartridges containing THC hash oil.” Agreed Stipulation of Facts at 1. Again, Dearman was charged and convicted under Indiana Code Section 35-48-4-7, which provides in relevant part that
(a) A person who, without a valid prescription or order of a practitioner acting in the course of the practitioner's professional practice, knowingly or intentionally possesses a:
(1) controlled substance (pure or adulterated); or
(2) controlled substance analog (pure or adulterated);
classified in schedule I, II, III, or IV, except marijuana, hashish, or salvia, commits possession of a controlled substance, a Class A misdemeanor, except as provided in subsection (b).
(b) The offense is a Level 6 felony if the person commits the offense and an enhancing circumstance applies.
(Emphasis added). As the parties acknowledge on appeal, “marijuana” is defined in relevant part as “including hashish and hash oil.” I.C. § 35-48-1-19(a). Thus, a defendant's possession of hash oil is not a violation of Indiana Code Section 35-48-4-7.
[5] We hold that, because the undisputed evidence shows that Dearman possessed hash oil, his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, as a Level 6 felony, must be vacated.
[6] Reversed.
Najam, Judge.
Kirsch, J., and Brown, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-CR-2951
Decided: March 25, 2020
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)