MURRAY v. STATE (2019)

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

William Eugene MURRAY, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff

Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-CR-1364

Decided: November 15, 2019

Attorney for Appellant: Ana M. Quirk, Muncie, Indiana Attorneys for Appellee: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana, Marjorie Lawyer-Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana

MEMORANDUM DECISION

[1] This opinion is being handed down in tandem with a companion opinion in Case Number 19A-CR-1350, and the issues raised by William Murray in both appeals are identical. Pursuant to our analysis in that case, we affirm.

Baker, Judge.

Kirsch, J., and Crone, J., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network