Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tarik Atum RE EL, Appellant–Petitioner, v. LAKE CIRCUIT COURT, Appellee–Respondent
MEMORANDUM DECISION
[1] Tarik Atum Re El appeals the trial court's order denying his “Petition for Change of Name and For Redress to Assume the Race/Nationality of Moor/Americas Aboriginal National[.]” Appellant's App. Vol. II p. 5. Finding no error, we affirm.
[2] Indiana Code chapter 34–38–2 governs petitions for a change of name. Among other things, the petition must “be filed with the circuit court, superior court, or probate court of the county in which the person resides.” Ind. Code § 34–28–2–2(a)(3). Re El filed his petition in Lake County, but he does not live in Indiana, he lives in Georgia.1 Additionally, the petition must include the petitioner's valid Indiana driver's license number, Indiana identification card number, or Indiana photo exempt identification card. I.C. § 34–28–2–2.5(a)(3). Re El included a Georgia identification card number; he did not include the number of a qualifying Indiana identification card. Therefore, the trial court did not err by denying Re El's petition.
[3] The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. On appeal, Re El contends that he is entitled to relief as a non-resident pursuant to Indiana Code section 34–28–1–2. That statute, however, applies to a petition “to establish a public record of the time and place of the birth of the applicant,” not to a petition for a change of name. I.C. § 34–28–1–2(b). There is no equivalent provision entitling a person who is not a resident of Indiana to seek a change of name in this state. Likewise, there is no statute giving Re El the right to the other relief he seeks in his petition—“For Redress to Assume the Race/Nationality of Moor/Americas Aboriginal Nation.” Appellant's App. Vol. II p. 5.
Baker, Judge.
Kirsch, J., and Bradford, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 17A–MI–3029
Decided: April 11, 2018
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)