Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sheila Manhas, M.D., Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Franciscan Hammond Clinic, LLC, Hammond Clinic, LLC, and Deepak Majmudar, M.D., Individually, Appellees-Defendants
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REHEARING
[1] Appellees Franciscan Hammond Clinic, LLC, and Deepak Majmudar, M.D., filed a petition for rehearing, in which Appellee Hammond Clinic joined, asking us to reconsider our memorandum decision issued on February 24, 2017. We grant the petition for rehearing for the limited purpose of correcting a citation error.
[2] In Paragraph 20 of our memorandum decision, this court set forth the proposition that “[a]s a matter of strict grammatical construction, the descriptive words in a phrase should, in the absence of punctuation, be referred to their nearest antecedent. ․” We, however, inadvertently attributed this quote to First Nat'l Bank of Peoria v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat'l Bank of Wabash, 171 Ind. 323, 86 N.E.417, 423 (1908), when in fact, the precise quotation was taken from FLM, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 973 N.E.2d 1167, 1176 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (citing First Nat'l Bank of Peoria, 171 N.E.2d 323, 86 N.E. at 423). First Nat'l Bank of Peoria states the principle as follows: “As a matter of strict grammatical construction, the descriptive words in the latter part of the phrase should, in the absence of punctuation, be referred to their last antecedent.” 86 N.E. at 423 (emphasis supplied). We hereby grant rehearing to correct this citation error. Our opinion is hereby affirmed in all other respects.
Altice, Judge.
Riley, J. and Crone, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Court of Appeals Case No. 45A05-1602-CT-328
Decided: May 02, 2017
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)