Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOE MISHANEC, Claimant, v. THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Respondent's motion to dismiss and Claimant's response thereto.
First, Respondent argues that Claimant has failed to comply with the pleading requirements of the Rules of the Court of Claims. Specifically, Respondent argues that Claimant failed to comply with 74 Ill Admin. Code 790.50 (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(8), (a)(9) and (b)(2).
The Court notes that this claim was filed nearly five years ago. Respondent had five years to object to Claimant's pleadings and did nothing. Furthermore, Respondent has not alleged that these pleading deficiencies have hindered its investigation of this claim in any way. Even if the Court were to grant this motion, it would grant Claimant leave to file an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies. At this late stage, such an order would merely delay a claim that should have been resolved long ago.
Second, Respondent argues that Claimant has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by filing a grievance or appealing the denial of his grievance to the Administrative Review Board. Based upon the record presently before the Court, the Court is unable to determine whether Claimant filed grievances concerning this claim. Respondent has provided no affidavit or other competent evidence that Claimant filed no grievances, even though Respondent has access to the Claimant's prison records.
Furthermore, the personal injury suffered by Claimant, falling down stairs, does not appear to have an administrative remedy available within the Illinois Department of Corrections. Unless and until a party demonstrates to the Court's satisfaction that the Department of Corrections can award money damages to inmates who suffer personal injuries, the Court will not require inmates to file grievances about such injuries.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied. This cause is remanded to the assigned Commissioner with directions to conduct an evidentiary hearing within six months.
MITCHELL, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: (No. 95-CC-1432 Respondent's motion to dismiss is denied and cause remanded for evidentiary hearing.)
Decided: December 15, 1999
Court: Court of Claims of Illinois.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)