STATE v. BOGGS (2022)

Court of Appeals of Iowa.

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. BOGGS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-0323

Decided: February 16, 2022

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., May, J., and Vogel, S.J.*

Anne M. Rohling of Rohling Law, PLLC, Council Bluffs, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel Mullins, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

David Boggs appeals an order denying his motion to extinguish his restitution obligation. His claim in this appeal is identical to the claim he raised in a prior appeal, Boggs v. State, No. 20-0311, 2021 WL 4592776, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021), in which we affirmed the district court.¹ We see no reason to treat this appeal differently. So we affirm without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d)(e).

AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

1. The argument section of Boggs's brief in his current appeal is identical to that in his brief for Boggs, 2021 WL 4592776, at *1.

MAY, Judge.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network