STATE v. GARCIA (2026)

Jesse Garcia admitted to committing the crimes of burglary in the second degree and domestic abuse assault with a dangerous weapon. To resolve the criminal matter, he pleaded guilty by a written plea agreement. In the plea agreement, Garcia agreed to serve ten years on the burglary count and two years on the domestic abuse assault, with the sentences to run concurrently. The court imposed the agreed-upon sentence at the sentencing hearing.

On appeal, Garcia asserts the court “failed to give due consideration to the [pre-sentence investigation's] recommendation, failed to state adequate reasons for rejecting it, and imposed a sentence inconsistent with Iowa's rehabilitative sentencing framework.” But what Garcia failed to show is good cause to appeal his conviction and sentence. See Iowa Code § 814.6(1)(a)(3) (2025); State v. Hightower, 8 N.W.3d 527, 534 (Iowa 2024); State v. Damme, 944 N.W.2d 98, 103–05 (Iowa 2020). Because he received the sentences to which he agreed and his crimes are not class “A” felonies, his appeal must be dismissed because we do not have jurisdiction to hear his appeal without a showing of good cause. See State v. Thompson, 951 N.W.2d 1, 2 (Iowa 2020) (recognizing Damme only established good cause to challenge sentencing following a guilty plea when the sentence imposed “was neither mandatory nor agreed to in the plea bargain”). Because we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal from a guilty plea, we must dismiss it.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GREER, Presiding Judge.