Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russell Dean LOWMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Russell Lowman appeals his convictions of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver methamphetamine under five grams in violation of Iowa Code section 124.401(1)(c)(6) (2023) and intent to deliver marijuana under fifty kilograms in violation of section 124.401(1)(d) after a trial on the minutes of evidence in Marion County. The district court suspended the sentences and imposed a five-year period of probation. Lowman asserts the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress the evidence because the warrantless search and seizure of his trash and Iowa Code section 808.16(3) are unconstitutional.
Lowman argues that evidence found in his garbage placed for waste collection is constitutionally protected property. But Iowa Code section 808.16(3) provides, “Garbage placed outside of a person's residence for waste collection in a publicly accessible area shall be deemed abandoned property and shall not be considered to be constitutionally protected papers or effects of the person.” Lowman's argument would require us to overturn the recent Iowa Supreme Court case State v. Amble, which held that section 808.16(3) is “constitutional on its face and as applied here.” 22 N.W.3d 265, 274 (Iowa 2025). The Amble court stated:
No longer may local antiscavenging ordinances support a finding that garbage placed outside defendants’ property for collection is not yet abandoned. No longer may defendants claim that an officer conducting a trash pull has committed a trespass. And no longer may defendants claim a reasonable expectation of privacy in discarded trash. Section 808.16(3) trumps any inconsistent local ordinance as a matter of state property law. Section 808.16(3) establishes that such garbage (including any papers or effects tossed out with it) has been abandoned as a matter of law. Defendants cannot claim a constitutional violation when police search abandoned property.
22 N.W.3d at 273 (internal citation omitted).
We are unable to “overrule precedent from our supreme court.” Willock v. State, No. 24-0014, 2025 WL 1704327, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. June 18, 2025). As a result, when applying our supreme court's ruling that Iowa Code section 808.16(3) is constitutional on its face, Lowman's claim fails. See id.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's ruling on Lowman's motion to suppress the evidence found in his garbage without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(a), (c), (e).
AFFIRMED.
SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 24-1388
Decided: September 17, 2025
Court: Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)