OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MICHAEL OSTENDORP (2017)

Supreme Court of Hawai'i.

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL G.M. OSTENDORP, Respondent.

SCAD-15-0000081

Decided: January 17, 2017

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Upon consideration of the December 23, 2016 petition and affidavit submitted by Respondent Michael G.M. Ostendorp and the record, it appears Respondent Ostendorp has complied with all relevant requirements upon which his six-month period of suspension from the practice of law is contingent, and has complied with the requirements of Rule 2.16 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), though we note Respondent Ostendorp still must complete an audit of his practice as provided in this court's May 3, 2016 order. It further appears the Office of Disciplinary Counsel was served notice of the affidavit, as required by RSCH Rule 2.17(b). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.17(b), Respondent Ostendorp is reinstated to the practice of law in the jurisdiction of the State of Hawai'i, effective upon entry of this order.

Paula A. Nakayama

Sabrina S. McKenna

Richard W. Pollack

Michael D. Wilson

Mark E. Recktenwald

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network