Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities CorporationMortgage Loan Trust, 2006-NC1, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant/Appellant/ Cross-Appellee/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. DANEFORD MICHAEL WRIGHT, ELLAREEN UILANI WRIGHT, Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants/Appellees/ Cross-Appellants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, COUNTY OF MAUI, WAILUKU COUNTRY ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellees FINANCE FACTORS, LIMITED, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff/Cross-Claim Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellee JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10, DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, DOE ENTITIES 1-10, DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants
ORDER DENYING THE OCTOBER 21, 2016 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Upon consideration of the “Motion for Reconsideration of October 11, 2016 Order Granting in Part the August 29, 2016 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to HRAP Rule 30, and for Leave to File Opening Brief and Answering Brief Forthwith; Order” (Motion for Reconsideration), filed on October 21, 2016 by Defendants-Appellants-Cross Appellees Daneford Michael Wright and Ellareen Uilani Wright (Wrights), the response to the Motion for Reconsideration filed on November 3, 2016 by US Bank National Association as Trustee for the Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust, 2006-NC1 (US Bank), the errata to US Bank's response to the Motion for Reconsideration filed by US Bank on November 7, 2016, and the record and files herein, it appears that on October 11, 2016, this court ordered that the appeal by the Wrights be dismissed and that US Bank's cross appeal be placed on the ready calendar and ” [n]o Answering Brief in the cross appeal shall be filed by the Wrights” due to the failure of the Wrights to timely file an Opening Brief in their appeal and an Answering Brief in the cross appeal. In the Motion for Reconsideration, the Wrights did not demonstrate good cause to excuse the Wrights' failure to timely file an Opening Brief on appeal and an Answering Brief on cross appeal. The Wrights also filed an Answering Brief on October 24, 2016, in violation of this court's order that no answering brief be filed in the cross appeal.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration is denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. CAAP-15-0000714
Decided: November 09, 2016
Court: Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai'i.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)