IN RE: DENISE F. HEMMANN. (2010)

It appears that the Notice of Discipline in this matter, which was filed by the State Bar regarding alleged violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct by Denise F. Hemmann, contains conflicting recommendations as to the discipline the State requested this Court to impose ¹ .  We therefore grant

Hemmann's motion to vacate our opinion of July 5, 2010 and hereby reject the State Bar's Notice of Discipline.

Notice of Discipline rejected.   All the Justices concur.

FOOTNOTES

FN1. The Notice of Discipline states that the Investigative Panel of the StateDisciplinary Board directed the Office of the General Counsel, State Bar of Georgia “toissue a Notice of Discipline for a Public Reprimand” and thereafter states that theInvestigative Panel “has determined that the appropriate disciplinary sanction to beimposed upon [Hemmann] is a Public Reprimand,” but the Notice thereafter sets forththe “reasons [the Investigative Panel] recommends that [Hemmann] be disbarred” andconcludes with a prayer to this Court that we enter an order disbarring Hemmann..  FN1. The Notice of Discipline states that the Investigative Panel of the StateDisciplinary Board directed the Office of the General Counsel, State Bar of Georgia “toissue a Notice of Discipline for a Public Reprimand” and thereafter states that theInvestigative Panel “has determined that the appropriate disciplinary sanction to beimposed upon [Hemmann] is a Public Reprimand,” but the Notice thereafter sets forththe “reasons [the Investigative Panel] recommends that [Hemmann] be disbarred” andconcludes with a prayer to this Court that we enter an order disbarring Hemmann.

PER CURIAM.