Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ROBERTS v. The STATE.
Victor Roberts was convicted of the 1983 murder of Mary Jo Jenkins and sentenced to death. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by this Court. Roberts v. State, 252 Ga. 227 (314 S.E.2d 83) (1984). Roberts was granted full habeas corpus relief in federal court, however, and his case was returned to the trial court for retrial. While awaiting retrial, Roberts entered into an agreement with the State in which the State agreed to waive the death penalty and Roberts agreed to plead guilty to murder and kidnapping charges. Roberts was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences. In 2008 Roberts filed numerous motions challenging his convictions. The trial court denied these motions and Roberts appealed. After reviewing the record, we dismiss this direct appeal.
Regardless of the nomenclature, each of Roberts' motions seeks to set aside or vacate his criminal convictions. See Marshall v. State, 229 Ga. 841(1) (195 S.E.2d 12) (1972) (substance controls over nomenclature in consideration of pleadings). A motion to vacate a conviction, however, is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case. See Harper v. State, Ga. (Case No. S09A1019, decided November 30, 2009); Williams v. State, 283 Ga. 94 (656 S.E.2d 144) (2008). Because Roberts was not authorized to seek relief from his criminal convictions pursuant to a motion to vacate or correct a void conviction, there is nothing for this Court to review and his direct appeal is subject to dismissal.1 See Harper, supra; Jones v. Henderson, Ga. (Case No. S09A1981, decided September 28, 2009).
Appeal dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. We note that none of the filed motions can be construed by this Court as a proper vehicle for attacking Roberts' convictions as they were neither filed within the time permitted for motions for arrest of judgment, see OCGA § 17-9-61, nor in the county in which Roberts was detained as required for petitions for writ of habeas corpus. OCGA § 9-14-43. See Crane v. State, 249 Ga. 501 (292 S.E.2d 67) (1982).
THOMPSON, Justice.
All the Justices concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. S09A1451.
Decided: January 25, 2010
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)