Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WILLIAMS v. The STATE.
Defendant was convicted at trial on armed robbery and other charges. He appealed to the Court of Appeals and alleged numerous errors, including an equal protection challenge to the constitutionality of OCGA § 17-7-52.1 The Court of Appeals transferred defendant's appeal to this Court.
This Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases in which the constitutionality of a statute is called into question.2 However, there is no basis for jurisdiction if an equal protection challenge to the constitutionality of a statute has been previously considered and rejected by this Court.3 In Lewis v. State, 255 Ga. 101, 106, 335 S.E.2d 560 (1985), this Court rejected the identical challenge to OCGA § 17-7-52,4 citing the legitimate purpose of the statute in protecting certain public servants from harassing or frivolous charges before the grand jury.5
As defendant's challenge to OCGA § 17-7-52 provided the sole jurisdictional basis for this Court to hear this case at this time, and as that issue has been previously decided, we transfer this case to the Court of Appeals for review of the remainder of defendant's enumerations of error.
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
FOOTNOTES
1. The statute allows certain peace officers to be present during grand jury proceedings to rebut charges levied against them.
2. See Ga. Const. Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. II(1).
3. See Zepp v. Mayor & City of Athens, 255 Ga. 449, 451, 339 S.E.2d 576 (1986).
4. But see State v. Deason, 259 Ga. 183, 184, fn. 1, 378 S.E.2d 120, fn. 1 (259 Ga. 183, 378 S.E.2d 120) (1989) (rejecting due process challenge to OCGA § 45-11-4, and expressly noting that the constitutionality of OCGA § 17-7-52 was not before the court).
5. The Court also rejected equal protection challenges to OCGA §§ 45-11-4 and 45-15-11, each of which sets out a narrow right to attend grand jury proceedings for certain public officials. See Lewis, 255 Ga. at 106, 335 S.E.2d 560.
THOMPSON, Justice.
All the Justices concur, except CARLEY, J., who dissents.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. S01A0363.
Decided: May 07, 2001
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)