CROFT v. TILLMAN (1997)

The appellant appeals from the trial court's ruling that a writing on which he relied to establish his title to certain land was ineffective as a deed because the legal description of the property sought to be conveyed was insufficient.   Because the writing, among other defects, fails to adequately describe the beginning point of the property or to provide a key by which the beginning point can be determined,¹ we affirm the trial court's ruling without opinion.

FOOTNOTES

1.   See Hedden v. Hilton, 236 Ga. 641, 642-43, 225 S.E.2d 39 (1976).

PER CURIAM.

All the Justices concur.