Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CHANEY v. The STATE.
Sixteen years after his conviction for felony murder and other crimes,1 Appellant James Chaney filed an extraordinary motion for new trial in the trial court, raising claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court dismissed the motion, and Chaney now appeals. For reasons different than those relied upon by the trial court, we affirm.
It appears that the trial court construed Chaney's motion as one seeking an out-of-time appeal, and in dismissing the motion, the trial court relied on this Court's decision in Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506 (5), 870 S.E.2d 758 (2022), which held that the out-of-time appeal procedure “is not a legally cognizable vehicle for a convicted defendant to seek relief for alleged constitutional violations.” But an extraordinary motion for new trial is distinct from an out-of-time appeal, and, therefore, the trial court's reliance on Cook was misplaced. See Bohannon v. State, 262 Ga. 697, 698, 425 S.E.2d 653 (1993). Nevertheless, Chaney's motion was properly dismissed.
Chaney's extraordinary motion for new trial raised only claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. An extraordinary motion for new trial, however, is an improper vehicle for such claims because an adequate alternative remedy exists in the form of habeas corpus. Mitchum v. State, 306 Ga. 878, 887 (2), 834 S.E.2d 65 (2019) (“Because habeas corpus provided an adequate remedy, an extraordinary motion for new trial was not the appropriate vehicle for [appellant] to pursue his claims, [including claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel,] and the trial court should have dismissed the motion.”). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of Chaney's extraordinary motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. This Court reviewed and affirmed Chaney's convictions on direct appeal in Chaney v. State, 281 Ga. 481, 640 S.E.2d 37 (2007).
Bethel, Justice.
All the Justices concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: S23A0892
Decided: August 21, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)