Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOHNSON v. The STATE.
Jerry Dean Johnson appeals from the denial of his motion for out-of-time appeal. For the following reasons, we vacate the trial court's order and remand for entry of the appropriate dismissal order.
In 2003, with the assistance of counsel, Johnson entered a negotiated guilty plea to rape, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and burglary. He did not timely seek to withdraw his plea or appeal his convictions. In February 2021, with the assistance of appellate counsel, Johnson filed a motion for out-of-time appeal in the trial court, alleging that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him about post-conviction procedures. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion, concluding that Johnson's plea was knowing and voluntary and that he failed to prove that plea counsel was ineffective. This appeal followed.
In Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506 (5), 870 S.E.2d 758 (2022), decided during the pendency of Johnson's appeal, the Supreme Court of Georgia held that
there was and is no legal authority for motions for out-of-time appeal in trial courts and that the out-of-time appeal procedure allowed in King [v. State, 233 Ga. 630, 212 S.E.2d 807 (1975)] and Furgerson [v. State, 234 Ga. 594, 216 S.E.2d 845 (1975)], approved in Rowland [v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 452 S.E.2d 756 (1995)], and followed in other cases, is not a legally cognizable vehicle for a convicted defendant to seek relief for alleged constitutional violations. Our holding applies to this case and to all cases that are currently on direct review or otherwise not yet final.
Johnson “therefore had no right to file a motion for an out-of-time appeal in the trial court; his remedy, if any, lies in habeas corpus.” Rutledge v. State, 313 Ga. 460, 461, 870 S.E.2d 720 (2022). Based on Cook, we conclude that Johnson's motion should have been dismissed, and we therefore vacate the trial court's order and remand for entry of the appropriate dismissal order. See Cook, supra at 506 (5), 870 S.E.2d 758; Lilly v. State, 363 Ga. App. 490, 871 S.E.2d 466 (2022).
Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction. Division Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.
All Judges concur.
Was this helpful?
Thank you. Your response has been sent.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: A22A0047
Decided: April 19, 2022
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)