Skip to main content

STATE v. GILMORE (2022)

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

The STATE v. GILMORE.

A20A0189

Decided: January 27, 2022

Leigh Ellen Patterson, District Attorney, Rome, Luke Anthony Martin, Morgan Birdsong Bottger, Assistant District Attorneys, for Appellant. Sean Justin Lowe, Jonathan Ross Hamrick, for Appellee.

In State v. Gilmore, 355 Ga. App. 536, 844 S.E.2d 877 (2020), this Court affirmed the trial court's denial of the State's motions to admit a video recording of a controlled drug buy. In State v. Gilmore, 312 Ga. 289, 862 S.E.2d 499 (2021), the Georgia Supreme Court reversed our decision, holding that the admission of the video recording was not barred by the Confrontation Clause, and it remanded this case for further proceedings. We therefore vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own, and reverse the trial court's judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Mercier, Judge.

Miller, P. J., and Senior Appellate Judge Herbert E. Phipps concur.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
STATE v. GILMORE (2022)

Docket No: A20A0189

Decided: January 27, 2022

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard