Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
RTT Associates, Inc. v. Georgia JE–037 Department of Labor.
RTT Associates, Inc. brought this action in the Superior Court of Fulton County against the Georgia Department of Labor for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing. In an earlier appeal, we reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in the Department's favor on the basis of sovereign immunity. RTT Associates, Inc. v. Georgia Dept. of Labor, 333 Ga.App. 173, 173–179, 775 S.E.2d 644 (2015). We also affirmed the trial court's denial of RTT's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Id. at 179–180(2), 775 S.E.2d 644.
The Supreme Court of Georgia granted the Department's petition for a writ of certiorari to determine whether we erred in reversing the trial court's order granting summary judgment in the Department's favor. The Supreme Court found as a matter of law that RTT failed to meet its burden of showing a waiver of sovereign immunity and reversed. Georgia Dept. of Labor v. RTT Associates, Inc., ––– Ga. ––––(1), (2), (3), ––– S.E.2d ––––, 2016 WL 2946376 (Case No. S15G1780, decided May 23, 2016). Accordingly, our decision in RTT Associates, Inc. v. Georgia Dept. of Labor, 333 Ga.App. at 173–179(1), 775 S.E.2d 644, is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court.
The writ of certiorari did not reach Division 2 of our decision. We have reviewed Division 2 of our decision and conclude that it is consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling. As a result, our decision in RTT Associates, Inc. v. Georgia Dept. of Labor, 333 Ga.App. at 179–180(2), 775 S.E.2d 644, became binding upon return of the remittitur and remains the judgment of this Court. See Center for a Sustainable Coast, Inc. v. Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, 326 Ga.App. 288, 289(2)(3), 756 S.E.2d 554 (2014).
Accordingly, both of the trial court's rulings are affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Ellington, Presiding Judge.
Dillard and McFadden, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: A15A0792
Decided: June 28, 2016
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)