Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MASSEY v. The STATE.
After pleading guilty to burglary, Massey was sentenced to serve a split sentence of twelve years, the first five years in confinement and the remaining seven years on probation. As a condition of probation, Massey was banished from the counties comprising the Southern Judicial Circuit.1 Massey contends that this banishment violates both the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XVII of the Georgia Constitution.
As Massey made no objection to the sentence in the trial court, neither of the constitutional issues he now raises as preserved for appellate review. This Court will not consider constitutional issues which were not raised below. Ogletree v. State, 211 Ga.App. 845, 846(1), 440 S.E.2d 732 (1994).
Furthermore, this is not a case of “exceptional circumstances” where the Court will excuse the failure and take notice of the error sua sponte. Presha v. State, 220 Ga.App. 124, 469 S.E.2d 293 (1996).
“[Massey] has the burden to show the probation condition is unreasonable. He does not contend that banishment itself is unreasonable but that it is excessive in length. We affirmed a banishment of ten years, with no discussion about length, in Edwards v. State, 173 Ga.App. 589, 590-591(1), 327 S.E.2d 559 (1985). [Massey's] probation condition was imposed on a sentence of lawful duration, and is of recognized utility. As the State points out, [Massey] could have been banished to prison for the entire [12] years.” (Citations omitted.) Id. at 125, 469 S.E.2d 293.
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Southern Judicial Circuit includes the counties of Brooks, Colquitt, Echols, Lowndes, and Thomas, of the latter of which Massey was a lifelong resident.
BLACKBURN, Judge.
POPE, P.J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. A97A2317.
Decided: November 03, 1997
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)