Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GREIG v. PUTNAM COUNTY et al.
Appellant Victor Greig was tried in the Magistrate Court of Putnam County and convicted of four violations of Putnam County's Zoning Ordinances of 1997. Appellant Greig filed a notice of appeal in that court specifying that he is seeking review of his judgment of conviction and sentences in the Putnam County Superior Court under OCGA §§ 15-10-41 and 15-10-65. Appellant Greig later initiated review of his judgment of conviction and sentences under these Code sections by filing a renewed petition for writ of certiorari in the Putnam County Superior Court. After sanctioning this petition under OCGA § 5-4-3, the Putnam County Superior Court dismissed appellant Greig's efforts for appellate review via orders entered on July 23, 1998, and September 15, 1998. The Putnam County Superior Court entered an order on November 10, 1998, denying appellant Greig's motions to extend time to file an appeal and to set aside that court's dismissal orders. This direct appeal arose when appellant Greig filed a notice of appeal in the Putnam County Superior Court. Held:
Although appellant Greig's notice of appeal designates that he is appealing the Putnam County Superior Court's orders as well as his judgment of conviction and sentences in the Putnam County Magistrate Court, this Court's jurisdiction is defined by the case sub judice's posture as an appeal from a superior court reviewing a decision of a lower court via certiorari. Such appeals must be made via discretionary application. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(1). Since appellant Greig did not comply with the discretionary appeal procedures prescribed by this Code section, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider this direct appeal. The case sub judice must therefore be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.
ANDREWS and RUFFIN, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. A99A0844.
Decided: March 04, 1999
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)