Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GROOMS v. The STATE.
Antwan Grooms appeals his convictions of obstruction of an officer, battery, and giving a false name to a law enforcement officer. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Finding the challenge wholly without merit, we affirm.
At the time of the incident, City of Stone Mountain police officer Mark Addington was working as a uniformed, off-duty police officer providing security at an adult entertainment club in DeKalb County. Grooms was a club patron. Alan Miles was a club bouncer. When Addington became aware of Grooms's presence, he asked him to leave because Grooms had been banned from the premises. Addington and Miles testified that shortly thereafter, Grooms punched Addington in the face without warning or provocation. Addington and Miles then attempted to subdue Grooms. They did so with the aid of a City of Clarkston police officer who came to the club in response to Addington's radio call for emergency assistance. DeKalb County police officer Calvin Carter also came to the scene and arrested Grooms. Carter testified that, at the time, Grooms was extremely inebriated and belligerent. Carter also testified that Grooms gave him a false name. In his defense, Grooms testified to the effect that Addington and the bouncer were the aggressors in the affray, that he had done nothing wrong, and that he had acted in lawful self-defense.
Resolving conflicts in the testimony of witnesses and weighing the evidence are functions for the jury.1 On appeal, we review the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.2 As long as there is some competent evidence to support each fact necessary for the state's case, the jury's verdict will be upheld.3 Adjudged by these principles, the evidence in this case is clearly sufficient to support Grooms's convictions.
Judgment affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Serritt v. State, 261 Ga.App. 344-345, 582 S.E.2d 507 (2003).
2. Sutton v. State, 261 Ga.App. 860(1), 583 S.E.2d 897 (2003).
3. Morgan v. State, 255 Ga.App. 58(1), 564 S.E.2d 467 (2002).
PHIPPS, Judge.
SMITH, C.J., and JOHNSON, P.J., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. A04A2318.
Decided: September 28, 2004
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)