THOMPSON v. STATE (2022)

Appellant's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.

I continue to adhere to my dissent in Thompson v. State, 341 So.3d 303 (Fla. Mar. 31, 2022), wherein I reaffirmed my dissenting view in Phillips v. State, 299 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 2020), and my belief that Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701, 134 S.Ct. 1986, 188 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2014), applies retroactively.

However, I agree that Thompson has not established a basis for rehearing, and consequently, I have voted to deny rehearing.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.