DOTY v. STATE (2021)

Appellant's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.

As expressed in my concur in part, dissent in part opinion in Doty v. State, 313 So.3d 573 (Fla. Feb. 13, 2020), I maintain my dissent to the use of “determinations” instead of “findings” to describe the requirements set forth in section 921.141(2)(b)2., Florida Statutes (2018). However, because I concurred in the majority's affirmance of Doty's death sentence, I also agree with the majority's decision to deny rehearing.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. COURIEL and GROSSHANS, JJ., did not participate.