Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULE OF PROCEDURE 12.200.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.200 (Case Management and Pretrial Conferences). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
The Florida Bar's Family Law Rules Committee (Committee) filed a report proposing amendments to rule 12.200. The Committee unanimously approved the proposed amendments, and the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar recommended acceptance by a vote of 36-2-0. The Committee published its proposal for comment prior to filing it with the Court and received no comments. After the Committee filed its report, the Court did not publish the proposal for comment.
Having considered the proposed amendment, the Court hereby amends rule 12.200 as proposed by the Committee. In subdivision (c) (Notice), the following sentence is deleted: “Orders setting pretrial conferences must be uniform throughout the territorial jurisdiction of the court.”
Accordingly, Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.200 is amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. Deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective immediately upon release.
It is so ordered.
APPENDIX
RULE 12.200. CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCES
(a) - (b) [No Change]
(c) Notice. Reasonable notice must be given for a case management conference, and 20 days’ notice must be given for a pretrial conference. On failure of a party to attend a conference, the court may dismiss the action, strike the pleadings, limit proof or witnesses, or take any other appropriate action. Any documents that the court requires for any conference must be specified in the order. Orders setting pretrial conferences must be uniform throughout the territorial jurisdiction of the court.
(d) [No Change]
Commentary
[No Change]
Committee Note
[No Change]
PER CURIAM.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. FRANCIS, J., did not participate.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. SC22-574
Decided: September 15, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Florida.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)