Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MARCUS B. HARRIS Petitioner(s) v. WILLIAM F. CRENSHAW, ETC. Respondent(s)
This case is hereby dismissed. This Court's jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs may not be used to seek review of an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Foley v. State, 969 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 2007); Persaud v. State, 838 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Grate v. State, 750 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1999).
No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.
A True Copy
Test:
John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court
td
Served:
TROY J. CROTTS
MARCUS B. HARRIS
HON. MARY BETH KUENZEL, CLERK
HON. STACY M. BUTTERFIELD, CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: SC17-2201
Decided: December 15, 2017
Court: Supreme Court of Florida.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)