Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOSEPH PIRELA Petitioner(s) v. ANGEL MIRANDA Respondent(s)
Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing has been treated as a Motion for Reinstatement, and said motion is hereby stricken as untimely.
A True Copy
Test:
John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court
lc
Served:
JOSEPH PIRELA
HON. HARVEY RUVIN, CLERK
HON. MARY CAY BLANKS, CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CASE NO.: SC17-917
Decided: September 15, 2017
Court: Supreme Court of Florida.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)