SIDNEY MARTS JR v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

Supreme Court of Florida.

SIDNEY MARTS, JR. Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: SC17-575

Decided: May 18, 2017

Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). Petitioner's “Motion for Production of Documents,” filed April 12, 2017, is hereby denied. No rehearing will be entertained by this Court.

A True Copy

Test:

John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court

Served:

TRISHA MEGGS PATE

SIDNEY MARTS, JR.

HON. PAM CHILDERS, CLERK

PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network