Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NEELAM UPPAL Petitioner(s) v. THE HEALTH LAW FIRM Respondent(s)
The “Motion for Re-Consideration” has been treated as a motion for rehearing. Pursuant to this Court's order dated March 1, 2017, the motion for rehearing is hereby stricken as unauthorized.
A True Copy
Test:
John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court
ca
Served:
GEORGE F. INDEST, III
NEELAM UPPAL
HON. GRANT MALOY, CLERK
HON. JOANNE P. SIMMONS, CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CASE NO.: SC16-2037
Decided: March 17, 2017
Court: Supreme Court of Florida.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)