NEELAM UPPAL v. THE HEALTH LAW FIRM (2017)

Supreme Court of Florida.

NEELAM UPPAL Petitioner(s) v. THE HEALTH LAW FIRM Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: SC16-2037

Decided: March 17, 2017

The “Motion for Re-Consideration” has been treated as a motion for rehearing. Pursuant to this Court's order dated March 1, 2017, the motion for rehearing is hereby stricken as unauthorized.

A True Copy

Test:

John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court

Served:

GEORGE F. INDEST, III

NEELAM UPPAL

HON. GRANT MALOY, CLERK

HON. JOANNE P. SIMMONS, CLERK

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network