Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MICHAEL C. ESSIX Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). No rehearing will be entertained by this Court.
A True Copy
Test:
John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court
two
Served:
JOHN M. KLAWIKOFSKY
MICHAEL C. ESSIX
HON. LINDA DOGGETT, CLERK
HON. MARY BETH KUENZEL, CLERK
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CASE NO.: SC17-28
Decided: March 13, 2017
Court: Supreme Court of Florida.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)