FREDDIE JOE CASH v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

Supreme Court of Florida.

FREDDIE JOE CASH Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: SC17-118

Decided: March 02, 2017

To the extent that petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus, the petition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). To the extent that petitioner seeks the type of relief available in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, the petition is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). No motion for reinstatement or rehearing will be entertained by this Court.

A True Copy

Test:

John A. Tomasino Clerk, Supreme Court

two

Served:

TRISHA MEGGS PATE

FREDDIE JOE CASH

HON. JON S. WHEELER, CLERK

HON. RONNIE FUSSELL, CLERK

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network