Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner(s) v. Addys T. WALKER, etc., Respondent(s).
The Court approves the uncontested referee's report as to indirect criminal contempt, which was filed with this Court on March 3, 2011. Respondent is found not guilty of the alleged misconduct, and the petition to show cause is hereby dismissed.
The order to show cause for indirect criminal contempt issued by this Court on October 9, 2009, is hereby discharged as Respondent Walker was not shown to have the present ability to pay the restitution and monetary penalty assessed in this Court's order dated January 25, 2007.
As previously stated in this Court's order dated January 25, 2007, Addys T. Walker shall pay restitution in the amount of $17,500 .00 to Christopher Watson, in the amount of $7,500.00 to Henry Watson, in the amount of $700.00 to John Hill, Jr., and in the amount of $1,200.00 to Linda Shabazz under the terms and conditions set forth in the prior report. Addys T. Walker shall provide a monthly written report to the UPL Department of The Florida Bar detailing to the petitioner to whom restitution has been made and the amounts paid.
Also, as previously stated in this Court's order dated January 25, 2007, Respondent is assessed a $6,000.00 civil penalty pursuant to Rule 10–7.1(d)(1) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, which shall be paid to this Court within sixty days after service of this order. This order is without prejudice to The Florida Bar to seek enforcement in the future.
Respondent shall not engage in the unlicensed practice of law and the injunction dated January 25, 2007, enjoining respondent from engaging in the unlicensed practice of law in Florida shall continue in its present form.
Each party shall bear its own costs in the indirect criminal contempt proceeding.
The Clerk shall place this file in the closed category to be reopened only if further enforcement actions are filed.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. SC05–437.
Decided: May 17, 2011
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)