STATE v. COWART (2000)

We have for review the decision in State v. Cowart, 762 So.2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), which the court certified to be in conflict with the opinion in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).   We have jurisdiction.   See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

 We recently approved the First District's decision in Woods, holding that the Act, as properly interpreted by the First District, does not violate separation of powers, and rejecting other constitutional challenges to the Act. See State v. Cotton, SC94996 & SC95281, 769 So.2d 345, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000).   Accordingly, for the reasons expressed in Cotton, we quash the Second District's decision in this case, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.   Because it appears that the respondent entered a plea of guilty based upon the trial court's indication that respondent, upon such plea, would not be sentenced pursuant to the Act, upon remand to the trial court, respondent shall have the right to withdraw his guilty plea.

It is so ordered.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Cotton, Nos. SC94996 & SC95281, 769 So.2d 345, 2000 WL 766521 (Fla. June 15, 2000).

PER CURIAM.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.