OWEN WILLIAMS MAUREEN WILLIAMS v. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST SERIES 2016 CTT YASMIN POTTINGER SILVERLAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC MARINA POINTE RECREATION ASSOCIATION INC UNITED GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA BEV THOMPSON INGLETON BEVERLY THOMPSON INGELTON (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

OWEN WILLIAMS and MAUREEN WILLIAMS, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, YASMIN POTTINGER, SILVERLAKES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., MARINA POINTE RECREATION ASSOCIATION, INC., UNITED GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA, and BEV. A THOMPSON-INGLETON a/k/a BEVERLY A. THOMPSON-INGELTON, Appellees.

No. 4D2025-0150

Decided: June 03, 2026

Ian Ricardo Aird of Law Office of Ian Aird, P.A., Pembroke Pines, for appellants. Richard Slaughter McIver and Joseph Gerard Paggi, III of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT.

Appellants challenge the trial court's entry of the amended final judgment of foreclosure in favor of appellees, as well as a separate order denying appellants’ renewed Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion to vacate final judgment of foreclosure. We affirm the amended final judgment of foreclosure and dismiss the appeal of the order denying appellants’ renewed rule 1.540(b) motion. The appeal of the order denying appellants’ renewed rule 1.540(b) motion is not timely; therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider that appeal. See Fletcher-Johnson v. Johnson, 423 So. 3d 420, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (“An order denying a motion to vacate is separate from the final judgment and is appealable separately.”); Ortiz v. U.S. Bank Tr. Nat'l Ass'n, 393 So. 3d 264, 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024) (“Because [Appellant] did not appeal the final judgment or the order denying his first motion to vacate within thirty days of their rendition, we dismiss the untimely appeal of the final judgment and the order for lack of jurisdiction.”).

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.

Per Curiam.

Gross, May and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network