Aubrey James Luker, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aubrey James Luker, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D2025-0099

Decided: June 03, 2026

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Michael L. Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Aubrey Luker appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree murder, challenging the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, the admission of photographs depicting him in jail attire and handcuffs, and the trial court's failure to hold a competency hearing or enter a written order adjudicating Luker competent. We affirm and write only to address the competency issue.

After Luker moved for a competency evaluation, the trial court appointed an expert who concluded that Luker was competent to stand trial. Thereafter, the trial court neither held a competency hearing nor entered a written competency order. Because nothing in Luker's motion or the record provided “reasonable grounds” to doubt Luker's competency to proceed, the trial court did not commit fundamental error. Hicks v. State, 391 So. 3d 620, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024), review granted sub nom. Hicks v. Florida, No. SC2024-1182, 2025 WL 2622056 (Fla. Sept. 11, 2025); accord Davis v. State, 394 So. 3d 801, 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024); Awolowo v. State, 389 So. 3d 788, 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

Affirmed.

Per Curiam.

Ray, Winokur, and Treadwell, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network