Felton Sears, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (2026)

Affirmed. See State v. Iseley, 944 So. 2d 227, 231 (Fla. 2006) (“The requisite ‘clear jury finding’ was made in this case. This jury's finding that Iseley was guilty of aggravated assault with a firearm as charged in the information is consistent with both the language of the information and the evidence adduced at trial. The information expressly charged that a firearm was used during the commission of the aggravated assault. Our review of the record establishes that the only deadly weapon involved in this case was the firearm referenced in the information and that there was no dispute that the weapon met the definition of a firearm. Consequently, we conclude that because the verdict form contained an express reference to the use of a firearm in the commission of the crime, the evidence supports that finding required by section 775.087, and the verdict of guilt of aggravated assault with a firearm constituted the clear jury finding necessary under our precedent.”).

PER CURIAM.