Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Restoration Genie, Inc., etc., Petitioner, v. Citizens Property Insurance Company, Respondent.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
Restoration Genie, Inc. (“Restoration Genie”) petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari and contends that the trial court's February 11, 2026 Order as to Taxable Costs and Stay of Proceedings, which granted Citizens Property Insurance Company's motion for stay and motion to tax costs as to the first action which was dismissed on March 5, 2025, should be quashed. That first action filed by Restoration Genie was dismissed by the trial court for lack of prosecution. On November 4, 2025, Restoration Genie refiled the case against Citizens.
Restoration Genie argues that the trial court's order was entered in error because Citizens never filed a motion to tax costs after the first action was dismissed and within the thirty (30) day requirement pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525. Citizens filed its motion for stay on December 18, 2025, and filed its motion to tax costs on January 8, 2026, over three hundred (300) days after the trial court entered its order dismissing Restoration Genie's case for lack of prosecution on March 5, 2025.
Citizens properly confesses error on this point and states that rule 1.525 provides that costs in a dismissed action “shall be assessed and judgment for costs entered in that action.” Citizens further asserts that the governing rule in this case is Florida Small Claims Rule 7.110(d) and points out that there is no material difference between the two rules. Courts require that the motion be filed in the same action. See City of Hallandale v. Chatlos, 236 So. 2d 761, 763 (Fla. 1970); McKelvey v. Kismet, Inc., 430 So. 2d 919, 921-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Accordingly, we grant Restoration Genie's petition for writ of certiorari as to the trial court's February 11, 2026 order, quash the order and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Petition granted, order quashed.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D26-0303
Decided: May 27, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)