JORDEN v. NASEERY (2026)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Ulus JORDEN, Appellant, v. Shanna NASEERY, Appellee.

No. 3D25-2459

Decided: October 22, 2026

Before MILLER, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ.

Ulus Jorden, in proper person. Law Offices of Brenda Gitchev Guerrero PLLC, and Brenda Gitchev Guerrero, for appellee.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the ․ proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see also Arthur v. Gibson, 654 So. 2d 983, 984 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (denying certiorari relief from an order denying appellant's motion to disqualify counsel where, in the absence of a transcript, appellant failed to demonstrate error and, therefore, the reviewing court “presume[d] the correctness of the trial court's ruling”); Estright v. Bay Point Improvement Ass'n, Inc., 921 So. 2d 810, 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (presuming the “correctness” of the trial court's order granting a motion to disqualify counsel where appellant did not contest appellee's prima facie allegations and failed to provide the reviewing court with a hearing transcript).

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network