Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Manuel GARCIA, et al., Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellee.
Affirmed. See Quintana v. Rodriguez Fam. Inv. P'ship, LLLP, 402 So. 3d 398, 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“On appeal from an order granting final summary judgment, the standard of review is de novo.” (quoting Safe Harbor Equity Distressed Debt Fund 3, L.P. v. 9775 Dixie LLC, 388 So. 3d 1093, 1096 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024))); Balch v. LaSalle Bank N.A., 171 So. 3d 207, 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (“We review the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to bring a foreclosure action de novo.” (quoting Lloyd v. Bank of New York Mellon, 160 So. 3d 513, 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015))); Shim v. Buechel-Pappas Tr., 402 So. 3d 386, 390 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024) (“To defeat summary judgment, the non-movant must come forward and produce or identify some evidence in the record showing there is a factual dispute between the parties that is both ‘genuine’ and ‘material.’ ” (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986))); Rich v. Narog, 366 So. 3d 1111, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (noting summary judgment may be granted “[i]f the evidence [presented by the nonmovant] is merely colorable or is not significantly probative” (quoting in re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.510, 309 So. 3d 192, 193 (Fla. 2020))); Ortiz v. PNC Bank, N.A., 188 So. 3d 923, 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (finding party may prove standing as holder of note based on blank endorsement by filing copy of note with the complaint and then filing “with the court the original note in the same condition as the copy attached to the complaint”); Kronen v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. as Tr. for WAMU Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006 AR3, 267 So. 3d 447, 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (stating that there may be differences between an original note and copy of original if there is sufficient explanation for those differences); Jelic v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 150 So. 3d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (finding bank did not fail to provide appellant with notice of acceleration where appellant “had no reason not to believe the notice was sent and [Bank] submitted an affidavit stating that notice was sent, along with an attached copy of the letter and records showing the letter was mailed”).
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 3D25-0090
Decided: October 22, 2026
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Answer a few questions and get helpful next steps for your legal issue.