B.M., a Minor, Appellant, v. MIAMI DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (2026)

Affirmed. See § 1006.13(2), Fla. Stat. (2024) (requiring each district school board to adopt a zero-tolerance policy for acts that pose a threat to school safety); Colonnade Med. Ctr., Inc. v. State, Agency for Health Care Admin., 847 So. 2d 540, 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (concluding the appellant's exceptions to an administrative law judge's recommended order were properly stricken because the exceptions were not timely filed); Kantor v. Sch. Bd. of Monroe Cnty., 648 So. 2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“Appellant argues that certain of the factual findings are not supported by substantial competent evidence. In this case a hearing officer from the Division of Administrative Hearings prepared a recommended order. The parties were advised of their right to file exceptions to the recommended order and the deadline for doing so․ We conclude that appellant ‘cannot argue on appeal matters which were not properly excepted to or challenged before the [agency] and thus were not preserved for appellate review.’ ”) (quoting Couch v. Comm'n on Ethics, 617 So.2d 1119, 1124 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993))).

PER CURIAM.